----------------------

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Pan-Fried Conservation: How to eat our way to healthy reefs


Most of the time, marine conservation entails convincing people not to eat the over-exploited seafoods they love. We tell people to stop eating the fried grouper sandwiches, spicy tuna rolls and shark-fin soup that they crave. Well, we don't have to avoid seafood altogether to help marine life - in fact, we should be eating more of it - so long as we eat the right species.

There is a fish you can crave guilt-free and eat to your heart's content because eating more of it will actually help Caribbean reefs. No, I'm not kidding. What is the most ecologically responsible fish choice you can make?

Read the rest to find out!

Your guilt-free fish dish:

Looks tasty, doesn't he?

You probably have heard of lionfish before. They're very popular in aquariums because of their ornate fins which warn potential predators of their painful venom. Lionfish are also known as Turkey Fish, Dragon Fish, Scorpion Fish or Fire Fish. The term "lionfish" actually applies to any of the species in the genera Pterois, Parapterois, Brachypterois, Ebosia or Dendrochirus, which are in the subfamily Pteroinae of the family Scorpaenidae.

Like the fierce cats they're named for, lionfish are voracious predators able to eat anything up to two-thirds their size. But now, their endless appetites threaten the natural ecosystems that attract thousands of tourists every year. This invasive predator has spread like a plague of locusts in the Caribbean and along the south eastern US coast, eating everything in their path since their introduction sometime in the 1990s, most likely from aquarium releases.

"They're like cockroaches," explains Bobbie Lindsay, a member of the Palm Beach Shore Protection Board who is one of the most vocal non-scientist voices about the invasion. "Bahamians know of reefs where there are 70 to 100 on a single rock," she explains. "That's beyond infestation!"

While it might seem exciting to divers to see this new, intriguing fish in their local waters, there's considerable downside to their sudden arrival. Research has found that lionfish feeding activities can decrease native fish recruitment by an average of 79% in the Caribbean, a number which might even be on the low end of the damage they do.

"They're eating everything," said Lisa A. Mitchell, executive director of Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), a nonprofit group that is helping both spread the word and get divers involved in dealing with this devastating invasion. "They could wipe out entire reefs."

Mark Hixon
, a biologist from Oregon State University, is one of the scientists tackling the invasion problem. For the past few years he and his graduate students have been watching the infestation grow, studying the ecological impacts of the lionfish.

"Native fish just don't know what hit them," explains Mark Hixon. "The small fish [in the Caribbean and Atlantic] don't do anything. They take no evasive action."

Lionfish have been sighted as far south as Venezuela and as far north as Rhode Island, and they've even been sighted this year in the marine sanctuary off the Florida Keys, the last remaining safe place for many of the Caribbean's most valuable and threatened species.

This lionfish invasion is an ecological distaster. We need a plan of action to manage this invasive species, a plan which will stop the spread of these quick-breeding sea-vermin and help protect the native populations from the advancing threat.

We need to eat them.

With how quickly lionfish breed, substantial predatory pressure is the only thing that will keep them from continuing to devastate Atlantic reefs. Unfortunately, we've completely decimated the top predator populations in that area, and those few that remain are showing no interest in stepping up to the plate. So, it's our turn to play the role we're all too good at. We have to be the top predator, and overfish this invasive predator into local extinction. Creating a strong fishery is the best management plan we have available, and is likely the last hope for many of the threatened Caribbean species.

But the real question is: how do they taste?

"Just like chicken," claimed Mark Hixon, when I asked him. "I don't know about chicken," laughed Bobbie Lindsay when I told her what he said, "but they're very good. Like rockfish, if you've ever had that."

It turns out lionfish are quite a delicacy (and have been one in Asia for a long time). You just have to get past the venomous spines, which isn't nearly as hard to do as you would think. Lionfish are venomous, not poisonous like blowfish, which means their toxins only affect you when injected into your skin. The toxic compounds, which are mostly proteins, are extremely sensitive to heat, so even if you did end up getting a little venom on your filet (which shouldn't happen anyhow because the venom is only in those long spines that aren't exactly appetizing), it would completely denature when cooked, rendering it harmless. In fact, heat is the recommended treatment for a lionfish sting because the venom is so sensitive to temperature that simply sticking your hand it hot water can destroy it.

Dive organizations are already getting in on the fishing action. This past summer, Lindsay helped organize the first annual "Lionfish Smash." The event's goal was to educate the public and spearfishermen about the invasion while catching as many lionfish as they could to serve up to locals. In North Carolina, Discovery Diving regularly goes out on lionfish round-ups (with help from enthusiastic divers like the one on the right). The caught fish are used both for ongoing research by scientists and organizations like NOAA and as tasty treats for the hard-working divers. They've even shipped off boxes of frozen fish to interested restaurant owners and chefs hoping to help boost the demand for lionfish meat.

Lionfish can be seared, fried, blackened, buttered, baked, stuffed, and even eaten raw, but until now the demand for their tasty flesh has been almost non-existent - that needs to change.

We need a call to arms - or, as one might say, to whet the appetites - of divers, tourists and conservationists who love the Caribbean, and get the word out about this tasty way that we can save our reefs.

If you live on the southern Atlantic coast or in the Caribbean and love to dive, volunteer to help out with REEF surveys or with dive groups like Discovery Divers that are going out and catching fish. NOAA and the other researchers are always looking for helping hands! Even if you don't live on the southeastern coast, tell others about the invasion and point them towards the organizations fighting it, like REEF and NOAA. Supporting lionfish research and helping spread information are the best things we can do (other than eat them) to help with the infestation.

No matter where you are in the US, you can talk to your local restaurants and tell them you want lionfish on the menu. It'll be worth their efforts - just ask Paolo di Chiara, owner and chef of Dolce Vita's World Cuisine in Eleuthera, Bahamas. He noticed that lionfish looked very similar to Scarfano, a kind of scorpion fish that is a delicacy in Italy. Now, his life partner Manon Tousignant dives every to catch the fresh fish that Chiara serves up in a variety of dishes, including a soup-like dish called Zupra di Pesce. "They're the most delicious fish in the Atlantic," says Chiara. Chefs and owners can contact Debby at Discovery Diving (dive@discoverydiving.com) to obtain fish, or ask local dive organizations about them.

Just think - if we all start asking for lionfish, and restaurants start serving them, we can eat seafood to our heart's content and be improving the ocean instead of overfishing it. While some other seafood options aren't terrible (if you want to know which ones, check out your local Seafood Guides from the Monterrey Bay Aquarium), none of them are as ecologically responsible as lionfish! Who'd have thought that you can promote conservation and eat fish, too?

Monday, September 28, 2009

Say 'Hello' to my creepy segmented friend.

So, Barry, his brother Brian, and I decided to spend our Saturday tooling around the Wai'anae coast. For those of you who aren't familiar with Hawai'i, the Wai'anae coast extends west of Pearl Harbor up to Kaena point, shown in the map on the right in orange. It's drier than most of the island, which leads to less polluted runoff, making the water there spectacular.

So we had a nice day. We played at the beach. We laid out in the sun. And, we decided to play some football on a nice stretch of green near one of the Ko Olina lagoons. Here's some action footage that I thought was just amazing:


While caught up in our game, however, I felt what seemed like a gentle tickling across my foot - maybe a blown leaf or something. You can imagine my horror when I look down to see this crawling on my toes:


In general, Hawai'i is truly wonderful because, unlike most tropical destinations, we have a shocking low number of things with venom or teeth that can give you any kind of painful wounds... at least on land. There are a couple spiders, supposedly some scorpions, though rarely does anyone seem to see them, and no snakes or large predators. Of course, we do have centipedes.

Centipedes are some of the lesser talked about arthropods, though instantly recognizable by their long, segmented bodies which carry a large number of legs. Yes, they can have up to 177 legs, so the name fits. But it's not the legs that freak me out- it's their nice, large pincers. See for yourself (look just below the smiling face):


Centipedes are venomous and their bites, though not fatal, can be nasty. They can leave welts the size of a baseball and really, really, REALLY hurt. Lucky for me, when I jumped and kicked this lovely one off of me, it didn't take the time to turn around and bite me for it. It did, however, book it out of there. You can see how fast they can be in this short video I caught of it running, though it wasn't going full speed at this point:
video

Needless to say, I was ready to quit playing football at that point... just the thought of another one lying around kinda creeped me out.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Weekly Dose of Cute: The Bravest Rodent EVER

I stumbled across this little story at Snuzzy.Com and simply had to share it. How's this for a brave little rodent?



Photos taken by Casey Gutteridge

As the story goes, what was initially identified as a mouse (though closer inspection identifies as a young rat) decided that it wanted some of what Sheena, a 12 year old African leopard at the Santago Rare Leopard Project in Hertfordshire, was about to eat for lunch. The leopard was quite stunned by the creature's boldness, and at first she was taken back and even acted a little frightened according to photographer Casey Gutteridge. She then stared for a few moments at the small creature stealing her tasty raw meat, finally choosing to walk over and give it a sniff. Either annoyed or amused, the deadly feline proceeded to nudge the felon, trying to convince it to leave her meal alone, however the courageous rodent refused to move until it was finished eating its stolen meal. Talk about balls!

The Santago Rare Leopard Project has been working for 20 years to breed the world's most endangered leopards like the clouded and snow leopards. Started by ex-dog breeder Peter James and his wide Jackie, the project houses around 15 rare animals, and is working hard to preserve these majestic species.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Get into the motion of the OCEAN!

I believe that most of my readers are very environmentally-conscious people. After all, how could you stand reading the ravings of a clearly tree-and-animal-hugging girl like me unless you had a soft spot for things that are green. So you all might like to know about a brand new, volunteer-based conservation group called OCEAN: the Online Community Environmental Action Network.

Here's what OCEAN's creator, David Shiffman, had to say:
I am proud to live in a time when more people care about protecting the environment than ever before. However, even with all of the amazing people working in the conservation movement, one of the biggest parts of my job is still public education. Most people have never heard that sharks are important, that sharks are in trouble, and that they can help. Many people have still not heard that the oceans are in trouble, and a few genuinely have not heard that the environment as a whole is threatened.

What solutions we can implement are limited by how many people know about the problem. The best science isn’t going to help if we can’t convince the general public of the need to do something. Every single one of us who cares about protecting the environment needs to help spread the word. In many cases, excellent resources for spreading the word are already in place- they are just underutilized.

It is with this important goal in mind that I am announcing the formation of a new volunteer-based conservation group : the Online Community Environmental Action Network (OCEAN).

The plan is that OCEAN members will utilize social networking sites like blogs, twitter, and facebook to share information. As a member (joining is FREE), you get updates from all over the world that you might find interesting as a environmentally-interested individual, and can submit your own content to be shared.

The more we communicate, the better the chance we have to make a real difference in the conservation movement and in our communities. To join OCEAN, just e-mai WhySharksMatter AT Gmail DOT com with the subject “OCEAN Application” and let him know that you want to be a member. Then keep an eye out for OCEAN-worthy content as you stroll the interwebs or write your own!

Get out there and join the motion of the OCEAN!

Friday, September 18, 2009

Happy Birthday To Observations of a Nerd!

Wow, I can't believe it - it's my first blogiversary! One year ago today, I posted my very first blog about why it's Obeservations of a "Nerd". I can't believe a whole year has gone by... it seems like just yesterday!

The blog growing up so fast. In just one year, I've already had my first political post, my first published post, and my first troll. The moments just seem to be flying by!

Well, since it's my blogiversary, I'm going to go do what I want to... have some drinks and celebrate! You should all join me in a toast with your favorite alcoholic beverage. Cheers to another wonderful year of science and fun!

Thursday, September 17, 2009

White-Eyes Killing Off Native Birds In Hawaii

ResearchBlogging.orgIntroduced and invasive species are a hot topic in ecology. Even when brought in for good reason, introduced species can have unforeseen negative impacts on the environment and the species around them. Take Cane Toads, for example. They were introduced to Australia to control a particular bug, but ended up eating everything they could fit in their mouths, especially native, endangered species. Or look at the mongoose, brought to Hawaii to control rat populations. While it does enjoy the invasive rodents, it also feeds on the eggs of native birds, decimating their populations. Now, there's another species to add to the list of dangerous invasives: The Japanese White-Eye.

Japanese white-eyes (Zosterops japonicus) are really, really cute little birds (see me with one on the R). At just under 5 inches with bright green feathers and a yellow throat, the white-eye is a colorful and attractive bird. It's name comes from the distinctive white ring around its eyes. You'll find them all over the Hawaiian Islands where they were introduced intentionally in the 1929 to control bug populations. Populations have grown exponentially since, devouring bugs and nectar wherever the white-eyes can survive. Since they're cute, few people have thought twice about the invasion of this pretty little bird. The federal fish and wildlife commission here doesn't think they're a problem, and has even revoked the permits of scientists studying the bird's effects. But, a paper soon to be published in Current Biology begs to differ.

You see, there were already nectar-feeders in Hawaii before the white-eye was introduced. These native honeycreepers, like the Akepa and the Amakihi (on L), are a little larger and breed slower than the white-eye. But what's worse for them is that the white-eye didn't come alone. It brought with it parasites like avian malaria that the native species had never encountered before. The sickness and competition for food have taken their toll. Since the arrival of the white-eye, native Hawaiian bird populations have plummeted.

That's what Dr. Lenny Freed and Dr. Rebecca Cann have shown using 20 years of mark and recapture data in the federal preserve Hakalau on the big island of Hawaii. The birds were caught using mist nets and all kinds of data was taken for each bird - weight, morphological measurements, age, sex, parasitic infections, and more.

The data revealed that over the years, where the white-eyes flourished, the overall survival of juvenile native birds has dropped. Specifically, the native species are being out competed for food resources, leading to signals of malnourishment. The bill length and overall size of the native species has decreased dramatically.

"Just as there are permanent effects of stunted growth in human children, there are permanent effects in adult birds," explains Dr. Rebecca Cann from the University of Hawaii at Manoa. "Birds cannot use their shorter bills to feed efficiently for themselves or when feeding their young. Stunted birds have higher death rates than normal size birds. The Japanese white-eye is causing this problem for native Hawaiian birds by depleting the food available for growth, survival, and breeding."

Where the white-eyes have yet to invade or are in low numbers, the native honeycreepers are healthier, with larger bills and higher survival rates.

In the end, the data suggested that white-eyes are most likely responsible for the decline of 7 of 8 native forest birds in a major portion of the Hakalau refuge. While there are other threats like malaria and parasitoids, the fact that juvenile birds fared well wherever white-eyes are not is pretty damning. Another paper, out of the same lab in Hawaii, has shown that decreased food availability is altering sex ratios of the native Akepa (PDF), leading to too few females - another way in which the competition for food with the white-eye is dooming native Hawaiian bird species.

The white-eye is yet another example of how invasive species can severely damage the communities they take over. And despite how many biocontrol methods have failed horribly, nations and scientists continue to consider them viable options to control pest species. It's a tangled web we weave when we add or subtract species from an ecosystem - we shouldn't do it so lightly.

Leonard A. Freed, & Rebecca L. Cann (2009). Negative Effects of an Introduced Bird Species on Growth and Survival in a Native Bird Community Current Biology

Leonard A. Freed, Rebecca L. Cann, & Karl Diller (2009). Sexual dimorphism and the evolution of seasonal variation in sex allocation in the Hawaii akepa Evolutionary Ecology Research, 11, 731-757

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Weekly Dose of Cute: Check out Paw-Talk!

I did a guest post for Paw-Talk.Net, a great blog about animals of all kinds. It's about eight of the cutest endangered species - so go check it out for your weekly dose!

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Next they'll tell me pigs can fly.

ResearchBlogging.orgLast night I had this wonderful dream. It was a normal day in just about every way except I had this amazing ability. When I jumped, I was able to leap great distances and almost fly. No wings were involved - it was almost like I was able to levitate, and slowly drift between places. It was a very calm, serene feeling.

Perhaps that's how the mice in Dr. Liu's lab felt. Advances in Space Research has published online today an accepted manuscript where researchers levitated mice. And, according to their observations, the mice took to the free-floating existence quite readily.

The team first used a magnetic field to suspend large water droplets about 2 inches in diameter. Feeling good about themselves, they decided to try the trick with a mouse of similar size and weight. The little guy, weighing only 10 grams, was placed in a cage-like apparatus that allowed the researchers to film the experiment as well as give the mouse food and water while allowing droppings to fall through the bottom. Then, of course, they turned on the magnet. A static magnetic field with a strength of about 17T and large field gradient of 1.17 T/cm lifted the hapless mouse off the floor.

At first, the mouse wasn't so keen on floating. It tried desperately to grab a hold of anything, and kicked around, causing itself to spin faster and faster. To alleviate some of the stress, researchers sedated the mouse slightly the next time. But before long - about 3-4 hours - even non-sedated mice began acting normally, including eating and drinking in their suspended state.

The team saw no observable negative effects of such a strong magnetic field on the animals, though further research will be necessary to determine if prolonged exposure causes health issues. Previous studies have found that a lower level of magnetic field (9.4T) didn't negatively impact mice, even when they were exposed to it for 10 weeks, but the stronger field used for levitation may have unforeseen, adverse effects after a long time.

While the researchers hope to use this technology for better understanding space flight and bone loss in astronauts, I think there are many applications. Carnival rides, for example. Oh come on - like you've never wanted to levitate!

Liu, Y., Zhu, D., Strayer, D., & Israelsson, U. (2009). Magnetic levitation of large water droplets and mice Advances in Space Research DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.08.033

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Google #FAIL

Sometimes, when I get bored, I play around with sites like Google. Barry was sitting there talking about how much he missed seeing the Steelers play, and before long, we were Googling how to get from Hawaii to Pittsburgh, including a quick and dirty Google Maps. So what's the best way to get from Honolulu to Pittsburgh according to Google Maps?


That doesn't look so bad. But, let's take a closer look at step 14:


That's right - Google recommends we kayak across the Pacific Ocean - all 2,756 miles from the north shore of Oahu to some park in Seattle. It'll only take us just over 15 days including the driving time - not bad, eh?

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Sometimes, I wish I was British.

Sure, there's the cute accent. There's the funny hats. There's the feeling of intellectual superiority when it comes to humor. There's even the fact that I could ignore painful dental visits without becoming socially ostracized. But mostly, I occasionally want to be British because of things like this:

Last Chance to See, BBC2, from Sunday 6 September, 8pm

Mark has joined forces with Stephen Fry to present a new series about threatened species, as inspired by the best-selling book which Mark wrote some 20 years ago with Douglas Adams, Last Chance to See.

The six-part series - which is entertaining despite being about animals on the brink - will include some of the old stars from the book. And it will introduce us to many new ones that have inevitably joined the ever-expanding cast of endangered species.

Updating the animals’ stories and explaining their ecological predicaments, Mark and Stephen have faced a catalogue of adventures.

Filming began in the Amazon, continued through Kenya, Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, New Zealand, Baja California in Mexico, Malaysia and Indonesia (see Mark's blogs).

6 SEPTEMBER - Last Chance to See: Amazonian Manatee
13 SEPTEMBER - Last Chance to See: Northern White Rhino
20 SEPTEMBER- Last Chance to See: Aye Aye
27 SEPTEMBER- Last Chance to See: Komodo Dragon
11 OCTOBER - Last Chance to See: Kakapo
18 OCTOBER -Last Chance to See: Blue Whale



My favorite book of all time is now a TV series, and I live in the wrong country to see it.

PS if you live in Britain, have a great TV to DVD recorder (or an in with BBC) and want woo me for whatever reason, I just might consider a gift of this series in its entirety similar to manner in which a wild female chimp regards meat. Just some food for thought.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Climate Change - is it for the birds?

ResearchBlogging.orgAs every year we humans pump out more and more carbon dioxide, our climate is changing. While select few in their fields disagree that any alterations are human-induced, the majority of the scientific community accepts the data which shows global warming and other changes - ocean acidification, for example - are occurring, and it's our fault. Even still, we hotly debate exactly what needs to be done, and meanwhile, the ecosystems are shifting.

While we argue who should cut what emissions or who's to blame, species are going extinct, and others are moving. Exactly how much is changing is surprising. Just ask Diana Stralberg - her team just published a fascinating paper in PLoS ONE about bird communities in California. They found that 60 years from now, over half of California could be occupied by novel assemblages of bird species. This means species will be competing with species they have never seen for food, nesting space, and survival.

The research team wanted to know how global warming and predicted temperature changes might affect the bird communities in California. Birds are often limited to specific temperature ranges. Stralberg and her colleagues hypothesized that as the overall climate changes, so, too, will the distribution patterns of bird species. So, they used a multivariate modeling approach to quantify the potential change in breeding bird communities based on current and future distribution models for 60 focal Californian species.


What they found was nothing short of staggering. Depending on the variables used - community scales, algorithms, and climate models - the areas that would be host to completely mixed-up species groupings ranged from 10% to 57%. They found that many of these new assemblages - up to 50% - would be completely unlike any current bird communities. The image above shows how different California's bird communities will be according to the different models. The redder the color, the fewer current bird communities exist that are similar, or analogs, to the community predicted to occur there in 60 years. In other words, the redder an area is, the less comparable it will be to anything we've ever seen. This means that we have, at best, a weak notion of what would happen to the different species involved and how they would interact with their environment. This could lead to dramatic community reshuffling and unpredictable patterns of species interactions.

What is out of scope of the model is how these new interactions might affect the populations and distributions of species. For example, the model might place two species with similar food niches in the same area, but it doesn't reveal how that competition might affect the population density of either species. One might out-compete the other causing local extinction, or both might survive in high numbers - we don't know, especially for areas with no current analogs to compare to. With these new interactions will inevitably come new challenges for conservation and species management, particularly for endangered species.

Models like this one show just how much climate change is impacting our planet. Not in 100 or 1000 years - now, in our lifetimes. It's likely that my generation and up and coming scientists like myself will see an unprecedented dramatic shift in the ecology of the world we live in, and it will be our responsibility to deal with whatever is left.

And yet, old men in starched suits who likely won't last to see the impacts of their actions are the ones who are debating and deciding should be done. Sometimes is just makes me angry to think about how unbelievably unjust and unfair it all seems, but most of the time, it just makes me more determined to do what I do. I'd like to think that, someday, I might be one of the old, grouchy people deciding what my outdated generation will leave as a legacy to the ones that follow, and if so, I'd like to believe that my decisions will be better.

Stralberg, D., Jongsomjit, D., Howell, C., Snyder, M., Alexander, J., Wiens, J., & Root, T. (2009). Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds? PLoS ONE, 4 (9) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006825

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

BioData's Scientist of the Month!

Every month, the blog at BioData.com features one scientist. They delve into the scientist's background, motivations for doing what they do, and general awesomeness. And guess who is the scientist of the month for August 2009?


... Yeah, that's right. You know you're jealous.

So if you want to know any more about me than you already do, feel free to check it out!